People
With Depression Tend To Seek Negative Feedback
*APA
Press Release*
New Study Contributes to Understanding Why Depression Is So Difficult
For Some People To Shake Off
Someone
who is "down in the dumps" or feeling "blue"
might welcome and be cheered by a kind word. Someone with clinical
depression, however, not only might not welcome such a gesture,
but might prefer to hear something negative. That's the finding
of a new study published in the August edition of the American
Psychological Association's (APA) Journal of Abnormal Psychology
which suggests that depressed people not only avoid favorable
feedback, they actively seek negative feedback.
The authors note that other studies have found that people with
depression tend to engage in behaviors that "create around
themselves the very environments that sustain their negative self-
views." Those behaviors, which tend to alienate people who
might otherwise try to help, include excessive self-disclosure,
hostile speech, negative self-evaluation, lack of responsiveness,
reduced eye contact, negative facial displays and slowed or monotonic
speech. With this study, the authors provide evidence suggesting
that people with depression sometimes enact these behaviors in
service of eliciting negative feedback.
For
their study the authors recruited three groups of participants:
people who were clinically depressed (28), those who were not
depressed and had high self-esteem (20) and those who were not
depressed but who had low self-esteem (25). Each participant was
asked to complete a packet of questionnaires and was told that
their answers would be the basis for a personality assessment
by each of two graduate students. They were also asked to rank
five of their own attributes (such as intellectual ability and
social competence) in the order of how much they wanted to receive
feedback on each one.
Later,
the participants were given what they thought were summaries of
the graduate students' assessments of them. But, actually, everyone
got the same two summaries, one of which was positive ("this
person seems well adjusted, self-confident, happy, etc.");
the other was negative ("this person seems unhappy, unconfident,
uncomfortable around others, etc."). They were then asked
to choose which of the full versions of the positive and negative
assessments they most wanted to read. They were also asked to
rate the accuracy of the two summaries.
Only 25 percent of the high self-esteem group chose the unfavorable
assessment over the favorable one. Sixty-four percent of the low
self-esteem group chose the negative assessment. In contrast,
82 percent of the depressed participants chose the unfavorable
assessment over the favorable one. Of the three groups, only the
depressed participants rated the negative assessment as more accurate
(i.e., self-descriptive) than the positive assessment.
There
were also marked differences between the groups regarding on which
personal attribute they said they most wanted feedback. While
58 percent of the high self-esteem group listed their best attribute
first, only 36 percent of the depressed participants listed their
best attribute first, suggesting depressed individuals fail to
pursue evaluations that are likely to be favorable as aggressively
as non-depressed people.
But,
the authors caution, these data should not be taken to mean that
depressed people should be blamed for their own depression. Seeking
feedback that is consistent with one's own self-views, they note,
is part of the process we all employ to maintain or restore feelings
of prediction and control. People with depression, then, are doing
what people with high self-esteem do: looking for confirmation
of their own self-views. Unfortunately, because depressed people
tend to possess negative self-views, seeking feedback that confirms
those views produces the added and unwanted effect of maintaining
their depression.
Article:
"Self-Verification in Clinical Depression: The Desire for
Negative Evaluation" by R. Brian Giesler, Baylor College
of Medicine and Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Robert
A. Josephs, Ph.D., and William B. Swann, Jr., Ph.D., University
of Texas at Austin, in Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 105,
No. 3, pp 358-368. 5/21/98
Back
to top